Understanding Acquisition Debt Limits for Co-Owned Residences

Understanding Acquisition Debt Limits for Co-Owned Residences

Background and Court Rulings – Prior to passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, mortgage interest was deductible on acquisition debt of up to $1 million. Originally, according to Chief Counsel Advice (CCA 200911077), when two or more individuals jointly owned a residence with acquisition debt exceeding $1 million, the allowable deduction was restricted to the interest on the first $1 million of acquisition debt collectively. This stance was supported by a Tax Court ruling in C. J. Sophy, 138 TC No. 8, Dec. 58,965. The debt limit could be increased by up to $100,000 of equity debt.

However, a significant shift occurred when the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the Tax Court’s decision. The IRS acquiesced to this new interpretation, notably in the Voss case (IRB 2016-31, p. 193). Under this approach, unmarried co-owners enjoyed a combined deduction limit for interest paid on a maximum of $2.2 million of acquisition and home equity indebtedness, in contrast to the former $1.1 million cap.

The acquisition debt limit was reduced for loans incurred after December 15, 2017 to $750,000 by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which also eliminated any deduction for equity debt.

Practical Implications for Tax Preparers

  1. Maximize Deduction Limits: For unmarried co-owners with home loans taken out prior to December 15, 2017, leverage the $2.2 million limit on acquisition and home equity debt interest deductions. This adjustment can translate to substantial tax savings for clients, potentially increasing their disposable income.

  2. Strategic Planning for New Acquisitions: With the reduced cap of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), consider the implications of the $750,000 acquisition debt limit. It's presumed that the expanded co-owner benefit under the Ninth Circuit's interpretation applies here as well, allowing unmarried co-owners a combined interest deduction on up to $1.5 million of acquisition debt.

  3. Counseling on Co-ownership Structure: When advising clients considering joint ownership of a property, highlight this favorable tax treatment for unmarried co-owners. Structuring property purchases with an understanding of these limits can enhance their tax strategy significantly.

 

Back to blog